[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5ab13ec-f650-ea10-5cb8-d6a2ddf1e825@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:15:47 -0700
From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
To: Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@...disk.com>,
"quic_cang@...cinc.com"
<quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
"quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com"
<quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"peter.wang@...iatek.com"
<peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
"manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org"
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
"minwoo.im@...sung.com"
<minwoo.im@...sung.com>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Keoseong Park <keosung.park@...sung.com>,
Ziqi Chen
<quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Gwendal
Grignou" <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
open
list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support:Keyword:mediatek" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated
list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support:Keyword:mediatek"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: add device level exception
support
On 3/25/2025 9:33 AM, Arthur Simchaev wrote:
> Hi Bao
>
> I think adding "struct utp_upiu_query_response_v4_0" is redundant and not correct for flags upiu response .
> You can use "struct utp_upiu_query_v4_0"
>
Hi Arthur,
This is not a flags attribute. This is for a Query Read 64-bit Attribute
data. In the existing code, we do not have a read 64-bit attribute, so
adding this new code would also allow future re-use.
The new "struct utp_upiu_query_response_v4_0" would improve readability
because it is formatted exactly as how the jedec standard defines for
Attribute Read. We won't need to use type cast to get the 64-bit value.
There would be no issue with efficiency because the same machine code
would be generated.
The existing "struct utp_upiu_query_v4_0" probably has a bug in it. It
does not use the __attribute__((__packed__)) attribute. The compiler is
free to add padding in this structure, resulting in the read attribute
value being incorrect. I plan to provide a separate patch to fix this issue.
Thanks, Bao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists