[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0wtzg0z.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:11:08 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>, Daniel Gomez
<da.gomez@...nel.org>
Cc: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>, Bjorn Helgaas
<helgaas@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Ingo
Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: Convert pci_msi_ignore_mask to per MSI
domain flag
On Mon, Mar 24 2025 at 20:18, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 07:58:14PM +0100, Daniel Gomez wrote:
>> The issue is that info appears to be uninitialized. So, this worked for me:
>
> Indeed, irq_domain->host_data is NULL, there's no msi_domain_info. As
> this is x86, I was expecting x86 ot always use
> x86_init_dev_msi_info(), but that doesn't seem to be the case. I
> would like to better understand this.
Indeed. On x86 this should not happen at all. On architectures, which do
not use (hierarchical) interrupt domains, it will return NULL.
So I really want to understand why this happens on x86 before such a
"fix" is deployed.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists