linux-kernel - Re: [tip: objtool/urgent] objtool, ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: Remove potential undefined behavior in wcd934x_slim_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z-KVKztS2TXoafRC@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:36:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: objtool/urgent] objtool, ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: Remove
 potential undefined behavior in wcd934x_slim_irq_handler()


* Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:34:53AM -0000, tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged into the objtool/urgent branch of tip:
> > 
> > Commit-ID:     46b70c569b774ea2c671bb3aff2a50d29760b7c3
> > Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/46b70c569b774ea2c671bb3aff2a50d29760b7c3
> > Author:        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
> > AuthorDate:    Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:56:09 -07:00
> > Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitterDate: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:20:29 +01:00
> > 
> > objtool, ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: Remove potential undefined behavior in wcd934x_slim_irq_handler()
> 
> FWIW the original patch doesn't seem to have made it into my inbox 
> (the regmap one did), not that it makes a *huge* difference but might 
> be some infra/script issue which crops up on some other more urgent 
> occasion.

Yeah, I noticed that the Cc: lines were incomplete for some of the 
patches, so before applying them I went over the series and regenerated 
the Cc: lines so everyone is informed and can review/object/ack if 
necessary.

If there's any serious mistake we'll rebase the branch!

Thanks,

	Ingo