[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250325122640.GK36322@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:26:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: guoren@...nel.org
Cc: arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, anup@...infault.org, atishp@...shpatra.org,
oleg@...hat.com, kees@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, brauner@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
unicorn_wang@...look.com, inochiama@...look.com, gaohan@...as.ac.cn,
shihua@...as.ac.cn, jiawei@...as.ac.cn, wuwei2016@...as.ac.cn,
drew@...7.com, prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com,
ctsai390@...estech.com, wefu@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com,
mingo@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, xiao.w.wang@...el.com,
qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn, leobras@...hat.com,
jszhang@...nel.org, conor.dooley@...rochip.com,
samuel.holland@...ive.com, yongxuan.wang@...ive.com,
luxu.kernel@...edance.com, david@...hat.com, ruanjinjie@...wei.com,
cuiyunhui@...edance.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
qiaozhe@...as.ac.cn, ardb@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 00/43] rv64ilp32_abi: Build CONFIG_64BIT
kernel-self with ILP32 ABI
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:15:41AM -0400, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: "Guo Ren (Alibaba DAMO Academy)" <guoren@...nel.org>
>
> Since 2001, the CONFIG_64BIT kernel has been built with the LP64 ABI,
> but this patchset allows the CONFIG_64BIT kernel to use an ILP32 ABI
I'm thinking you're going to be finding a metric ton of assumptions
about 'unsigned long' being 64bit when 64BIT=y throughout the kernel.
I know of a couple of places where 64BIT will result in different math
such that a 32bit 'unsigned long' will trivially overflow.
Please, don't do this. This adds a significant maintenance burden on all
of us.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists