linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add network flow classification support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250325072419.778810f3@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 07:24:19 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
Cc: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell
 King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, danishanwar@...com, srk@...com,
 linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add network
 flow classification support

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:38:34 +0200 Roger Quadros wrote:
> +	if (fs->location == RX_CLS_LOC_ANY ||
> +	    fs->location >= port->rxnfc_max)
> +		return -EINVAL;

Could you clarify in the commit message that the rules are evaluated 
in strict order? And what the order is?