linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/77] 6.6.85-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvWau1nC8wmpWkxG8gWPaRMP9pbkh2eNsAZoUMeRPgzqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 20:37:42 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/77] 6.6.85-rc1 review

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 18:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.85 release.
> There are 77 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:21:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.85-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Regressions on arm64 rk3399 dtb builds failed with gcc-13 the
stable-rc 6.6.85-rc1

First seen on the v6.6.83-245-gc1fb5424adea
 Good: v6.6.84
 Bad: 6.6.85-rc1

* arm64, build
  - gcc-13-defconfig

Regression Analysis:
 - New regression? yes
 - Reproducibility? Yes


Build regression: arm64 dtb rockchip non-existent node or label "vcca_0v9"
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build log
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi:221.23-266.4: ERROR
(phandle_references):
/pcie@...00000: Reference to non-existent node or label "vcca_0v9"

  also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi:659.8-669.3

## Source
* Kernel version: 6.6.85-rc1
* Git tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* Git sha: c1fb5424adea53e3a4d8b2018c5e974f7772af29
* Git describe: v6.6.83-245-gc1fb5424adea
* Project details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.83-245-gc1fb5424adea/

## Build
* Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.83-245-gc1fb5424adea/testrun/27760755/suite/build/test/gcc-13-defconfig/log
* Build history:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.83-245-gc1fb5424adea/testrun/27763720/suite/build/test/gcc-13-defconfig/history/
* Build details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.83-245-gc1fb5424adea/testrun/27760755/suite/build/test/gcc-13-defconfig/
* Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2uoHmBcVLd60GQ0SVHWAaZRZfNd/
* Kernel config:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2uoHmBcVLd60GQ0SVHWAaZRZfNd/config

## Steps to reproduce
 - # tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig defconfig


--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org