linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] MIPS: Fix idle VS timer enqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2503261556020.47733@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:01:51 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
    Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, 
    Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
    Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, 
    Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
    Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] MIPS: Fix idle VS timer enqueue

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Marco Crivellari wrote:

> I'm mostly thinking about future changes in this part of the code.
> But if it is ok what we have now, and future changes are not a
> problem, let's keep this version.
> 
> Would this be ok with you @Maciej?

 Nope, I think it's the wrong direction and I have a longer reply in the 
queue, but I yet need some time to complete it.  I just got off the plane 
having been away from home for a month and I have other stuff to do first.  
If it was broken for ~30 years, it can wait a couple days yet.

  Maciej