[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiXEvC2r=Sa_tpYjd=g+AxZDxxjSdq1WADTvZYZ9oUi_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:25:22 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Konstantin Ryabitsev <mricon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 updates 6.15-rc1
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 10:11, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> So it definitely goes through kernel.org.
>
> But it has no DKIM headers.
Funky.
There's definitely something strange going on, because your *previous*
email to me did have the DKIM signature:
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF624C4CEE2...
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;[..]
[...]
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:40:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 updates 6.15-rc1
Message-ID: <20250326124025.1966bf8a@...dalf.local.home>
and gmail was explicitly happy with it:
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass [...]
but then this later one didn't:
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CDA5C4CEE2...
[...]
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:12:00 -0400
Message-ID: <20250326131200.1c86c657@...dalf.local.home>
and for some reason gmail also didn't actually react to the lack of
DKIM on that second one and only talks about how spf was fine.
Konstantin? Can you tell what's going on?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists