[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ii74e3kgrkamwkx3md6mkalmmzffi6c6ieoebepu6e7bsrjikg@acalyy2cmi6b>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:57:08 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
david@...morbit.com, rafael@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, pavel@...nel.org,
song@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] ext4: replace kthread freezing with auto fs freezing
On Wed 26-03-25 04:22:18, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 0d523e9fb3d5..ae235ec5ff3a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -6782,7 +6782,7 @@ static ext4_grpblk_t ext4_last_grp_cluster(struct super_block *sb,
>
> static bool ext4_trim_interrupted(void)
> {
> - return fatal_signal_pending(current) || freezing(current);
> + return fatal_signal_pending(current);
> }
I think this is wrong. ext4_trim_interrupted() gets called from a normal
process that's doing fstrim (which can take a long time and we don't want
to block system suspend with it). So IMO this should stay as is.
Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists