[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250326-cross-lock-dep-v1-2-3199e49e8652@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:26:17 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...x.de>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
linux-imx@....com, Ian Ray <ian.ray@...ealthcare.com>,
Hervé Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 02/10] clk: Improve comments with usual punctuation
These two-line comments did not meant anything to me until I figured out
they were two separated sentences. Clarify these comments.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index cf7720b9172ff223d86227aad144e15375ddfd86..7df9965bcbdffd641e6dbf5bff3d3b20079a3af3 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ static bool clk_core_is_prepared(struct clk_core *core)
bool ret = false;
/*
- * .is_prepared is optional for clocks that can prepare
- * fall back to software usage counter if it is missing
+ * .is_prepared is optional for clocks that can prepare.
+ * Fall back to software usage counter if it is missing.
*/
if (!core->ops->is_prepared)
return core->prepare_count;
@@ -308,8 +308,8 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
bool ret = false;
/*
- * .is_enabled is only mandatory for clocks that gate
- * fall back to software usage counter if .is_enabled is missing
+ * .is_enabled is only mandatory for clocks that gate.
+ * Fall back to software usage counter if .is_enabled is missing
*/
if (!core->ops->is_enabled)
return core->enable_count;
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists