[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b02fcfedcd006d202d38e2ec16b477919264408.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:46:21 -0400
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs for 6.15, v2...
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 14:56 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> The following changes since commit
> 1a2b74d0a2a46c219b25fdb0efcf9cd7f55cfe5e:
>
> bcachefs: fix build on 32 bit in get_random_u64_below() (2025-03-14
> 19:45:54 -0400)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefs.git tags/bcachefs-2025-03-24
>
> for you to fetch changes up to
> d8bdc8daac1d1b0a4efb1ecc69bef4eb4fc5e050:
>
> bcachefs: Kill unnecessary bch2_dev_usage_read() (2025-03-24
> 09:50:37 -0400)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> bcachefs updates for 6.15
I note that the controversial block changes that got NAK'd but which
you tried to put into your first pull request are now removed from this
v2 pull request, thanks.
I also thought it was time to state more formally what's been
circulating around a few maintainers as shared knowledge: any tree you
send a pull request for that includes changes outside of bcachefs won't
be accepted by Linus.
Regards,
James Bottomley
Powered by blists - more mailing lists