[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250326213352.GB2844851-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:33:52 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@...nzli.dev>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] rust: Read properties via single generic method
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:13:44PM +0100, Remo Senekowitsch wrote:
> This can probably be squashed into its parent. I haven't done that
> yet in case there is something wrong with the generic approach and the
> previous one is preferred.
Looks good to me other than the returning of strings issue. And yes it
should be squashed. (Really, it should have been in this series so
reviewers aren't reviewing code you delete in the next patch).
>
> Signed-off-by: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@...nzli.dev>
> ---
> rust/kernel/property.rs | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists