[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250326185710.5ad0f9ad@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:57:10 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <mricon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 updates 6.15-rc1
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:45:02 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> My understanding is this:
>
> for normal SPF checks (i.e. not DMARC's SPF checks) the test is done on
> the envelope sender and in Steve's case, goodmis.org DNS SPF record
> says that anything from goodmis.org can come from the kernel.org
> servers. DMARC applies the SPF check to the From: header address.
Ah right. Thanks for looking into this. This brings back a memory where I added:
"v=spf1 include:kernel.org"
to the DNS TXT record for goodmis.org.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists