linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rcu 10/11] srcu: Add FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z-OTqMiXMhnImKDC@Mac.home>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 22:42:00 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,	"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 10/11] srcu: Add FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig for
 testing

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:51:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 04:36:23PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > 
> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 16:08, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > commit 2245ef8605a80726548253d885b4cadd97f69f3b
> > > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > > Date:   Tue Mar 25 07:31:45 2025 -0700
> > >
> > >     srcu: Make FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE depend on RCU_EXPERT
> > >
> > >     The FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE is useful only for those wishing to test
> > >     the SRCU code paths that accommodate architectures that do not have
> > >     NMI-safe per-CPU operations, that is, those architectures that do not
> > >     select the ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option.  As such, this
> > >     is a specialized Kconfig option that is not intended for casual users.
> > >
> > >     This commit therefore hides it behind the RCU_EXPERT Kconfig option.
> > >     Given that this new FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig option has no effect
> > >     unless the ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option is also selected,
> > >     it also depends on this Kconfig option.
> > >
> > >     [ paulmck: Apply Geert Uytterhoeven feedback. ]
> > >
> > >     Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > >     Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdX6dy9_tmpLkpcnGzxyRbe6qSWYukcPp=H1GzZdyd3qBQ@mail.gmail.com/
> > >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > index b3f985d41717a..ceaf6594f634c 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ config TREE_SRCU
> > >  config FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
> > >         bool "Force selection of NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE"
> > >         depends on !TINY_SRCU
> > > +       depends on RCU_EXPERT
> > > +       depends on ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS
> > >         select NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
> > >         default n
> > >         help
> > 
> > LGTM, so
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> 
> Applied, and thank you very much for both the review and the report!
> 

Queued for further testing, thank you both!

Regards,
Boqun

> 							Thanx, Paul