lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <VI1PR04MB10049E90AC1CB4823F91D1D698FA62@VI1PR04MB10049.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:58:48 +0000
From: Manjunatha Venkatesh <manjunatha.venkatesh@....com>
To: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>, Frank Li
	<frank.li@....com>
CC: "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org"
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "bbrezillon@...nel.org"
	<bbrezillon@...nel.org>, "linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "rvmanjumce@...il.com"
	<rvmanjumce@...il.com>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5] i3c: Fix read from unreadable memory at
 i3c_master_queue_ibi()



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 12:15 PM
> To: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>; Manjunatha Venkatesh
> <manjunatha.venkatesh@....com>
> Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com; arnd@...db.de;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; bbrezillon@...nel.org; linux-
> i3c@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> rvmanjumce@...il.com; stable@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5] i3c: Fix read from unreadable memory at
> i3c_master_queue_ibi()
> 
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> this email' button
> 
> 
> On 3/25/2025 8:13 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> > Subject should be
> >
> > i3c: Add NULL pointer check in i3c_master_queue_ibi()
> >
> yes, Aligned.
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 03:53:32PM +0530, Manjunatha Venkatesh wrote:
> >> As part of I3C driver probing sequence for particular device
> >> instance, While adding to queue it is trying to access ibi variable
> >> of dev which is not yet initialized causing "Unable to handle kernel
> >> read from unreadable memory" resulting in kernel panic.
> >>
> >> Below is the sequence where this issue happened.
> >> 1. During boot up sequence IBI is received at host  from the slave device
> >>     before requesting for IBI, Usually will request IBI by calling
> >>     i3c_device_request_ibi() during probe of slave driver.
> >> 2. Since master code trying to access IBI Variable for the particular
> >>     device instance before actually it initialized by slave driver,
> >>     due to this randomly accessing the address and causing kernel panic.
> >> 3. i3c_device_request_ibi() function invoked by the slave driver where
> >>     dev->ibi = ibi; assigned as part of function call
> >>     i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked().
> >> 4. But when IBI request sent by slave device, master code  trying to access
> >>     this variable before its initialized due to this race condition
> >>     situation kernel panic happened.
> >
> > How about commit message as:
> >
> > The I3C master driver may receive an IBI from a target device that has
> > not been probed yet. In such cases, the master calls
> > `i3c_master_queue_ibi()` to queue an IBI work task, leading to "Unable
> > to handle kernel read from unreadable memory" and resulting in a kernel
> panic.
> >
> > Typical IBI handling flow:
> > 1. The I3C master scans target devices and probes their respective drivers.
> > 2. The target device driver calls `i3c_device_request_ibi()` to enable IBI
> >     and assigns `dev->ibi = ibi`.
> > 3. The I3C master receives an IBI from the target device and calls
> >     `i3c_master_queue_ibi()` to queue the target device driver's IBI handler
> >     task.
> >
> > However, since target device events are asynchronous to the I3C probe
> > sequence, step 3 may occur before step 2, causing `dev->ibi` to be
> > `NULL`, leading to a kernel panic.
> >
> > Add a NULL pointer check in `i3c_master_queue_ibi()` to prevent
> > accessing an uninitialized `dev->ibi`, ensuring stability.
> >
> >>
> >> Fixes: 3a379bbcea0af ("i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure")
> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >> Link:
> >> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flor
> >> e.kernel.org%2Flkml%2FZ9gjGYudiYyl3bSe%40lizhi-Precision-Tower-
> 5810%2
> >>
> F&data=05%7C02%7Cmanjunatha.venkatesh%40nxp.com%7Ceda8be8c7abc4
> 3b4ab9
> >>
> 608dd6c31c8e7%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6387
> 856832
> >>
> 77582903%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYi
> OiIwLjAu
> >>
> MDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%
> 7C%7C
> >>
> &sdata=oyc9Wv%2Fj8HMRFIiIGL9nIw0XvI6FsLK2SvsQJ55H7XI%3D&reserved=
> 0
> >> Signed-off-by: Manjunatha Venkatesh <manjunatha.venkatesh@....com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes since v4:
> >>    - Fix added at generic places master.c which is applicable for all
> >> platforms
> >>
> >>   drivers/i3c/master.c | 3 +++
> >>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c index
> >> d5dc4180afbc..c65006aa0684 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> >> @@ -2561,6 +2561,9 @@ static void
> i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs(struct i3c_master_controller *master)
> >>    */
> >>   void i3c_master_queue_ibi(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev, struct i3c_ibi_slot
> *slot)
> >>   {
> >> +    if (!dev->ibi || !slot)
> >> +            return;
> >> +
> 1. Shouldn't this be a Logical AND ? what if slot is non NULL but the IBI is
> NULL ?
> 
[Manjunatha Venkatesh] : I think Logical OR operation is correct,
 Since if any one of the variable is NULL need to return before accessing those variables.
> 2. This being void function, it doesn't say anything to caller if it's successful or
> failed ? Should we make this non void function ?
> if not, i am thinking it may run into multiple attempts, no log too.
[Manjunatha Venkatesh] : If required we can add error print log, Others please confirm your opinion on this.  
> >>      atomic_inc(&dev->ibi->pending_ibis);
> >>      queue_work(dev->ibi->wq, &slot->work);
> >>   }
> >> --
> >> 2.46.1
> >>
> >


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ