[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bd3c029-807b-457c-8ada-2d895a96bc84@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:22:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/34] mfd: sec: merge separate core and irq modules
On 23/03/2025 23:39, André Draszik wrote:
> There is no reason to have these two kernel modules separate. Having
> them merged into one kernel module also slightly reduces memory
> consumption and module load times a little.
>
> mapped size (lsmod):
> before: after:
> sec_core 20480 sec_core 24576
> sec_irq 16384
> ----------------
> total 36864
>
> Section sizes (size -A):
> before: after:
> sec_core 6780 sec_core 13239
> sec_irq 8046
> ----------------
> Total 14826
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists