[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<CWLP123MB54738759F49D377A9F080AA0C5A62@CWLP123MB5473.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:31:14 +0000 (GMT)
From: Manuel Fombuena <fombuena@...look.com>
To: pavel@....cz, lee@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
vicentiu.galanopulo@...ote-tech.co.uk, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: leds: remove .rst extension for
leds-st1202 on index
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Manuel Fombuena wrote:
> No other LED driver is listed on index.rst with the extension .rst.
> Remove it.
>
> Fixes: b1816b22381b ("Documentation:leds: Add leds-st1202.rst")
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Fombuena <fombuena@...look.com>
> ---
> Documentation/leds/index.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/leds/index.rst b/Documentation/leds/index.rst
> index 0ab0a2128a11..76fae171039c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/leds/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/leds/index.rst
> @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ LEDs
> leds-mlxcpld
> leds-mt6370-rgb
> leds-sc27xx
> - leds-st1202.rst
> + leds-st1202
> leds-qcom-lpg
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
Now that 6.14 is out, should I re-send this for 'for-leds-next' or there
is no need?
--
Manuel Fombuena
Powered by blists - more mailing lists