linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Add GBETH glue layer driver for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8vS=MQRtO8N+GO6EUekRDrytWj8p3=ahYo71gt+m=DdiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:34:50 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, 
	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, 
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Add GBETH glue layer driver for Renesas
 RZ/V2H(P) SoC

Hi Andrew and Jakub,

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:29 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:21:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:52:17 +0000 Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > This patch series has been marked as "Changes Requested" on Patchwork,
> > > but there were no review comments on the series. If the status was
> > > marked as "Changes Requested" due to build failures reported by the
> > > kernel bots, I’d like to clarify that the failure was caused by a
> > > patch dependency, which has now been merged into net-next [0]. As a
> > > result, this series should now build successfully on net-next.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you would like me to resend the series.
> >
> > Don't send patches which can't be immediately merged.
> > You will have to repost, obviously, and after the merge window.
>
Thanks, I'll resend the patches after the merge window.

> Just expanding on that a bit. We do more than build testing of
> patches. Some runtime testing is also performed. So if they failed to
> build, they cannot be fully tested. Hence the request to only post
> patches which build.
>
Thanks for the clarification.

> You can however send the patches as RFC, so we know to ignore them for
> merging.
>
I'll make sure to send such patches as RFC in the future to indicate
that they are not ready for merging. Thanks for the clarification!

Cheers,
Prabhakar