[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2503261447500.4152@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:48:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
indu.bhagat@...cle.com, puranjay@...nel.org, wnliu@...gle.com,
irogers@...gle.com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, peterz@...radead.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
rostedt@...dmis.org, will@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: Implement arch_stack_walk_reliable
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, Song Liu wrote:
> With proper exception boundary detection, it is possible to implment
> arch_stack_walk_reliable without sframe.
>
> Note that, arch_stack_walk_reliable does not guarantee getting reliable
> stack in all scenarios. Instead, it can reliably detect when the stack
> trace is not reliable, which is enough to provide reliable livepatching.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
M
Powered by blists - more mailing lists