linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc64/ftrace: fix module loading without patchable function entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <554356f9-1672-4c15-a2f2-8cdc16042e3d@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:14:47 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Adam Williamson <awilliam@...hat.com>, Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
        Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@...e.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jforbes@...hat.com, kevin@...ye.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc64/ftrace: fix module loading without patchable
 function entries



On 3/26/25 6:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 22:29 +0530, Naveen N Rao wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:18:21AM +0100, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote:
>>> get_stubs_size assumes that there must always be at least one patchable
>>> function entry, which is not always the case (modules that export data
>>> but no code), otherwise it returns -ENOEXEC and thus the section header
>>> sh_size is set to that value. During module_memory_alloc() the size is
>>> passed to execmem_alloc() after being page-aligned and thus set to zero
>>> which will cause it to fail the allocation (and thus module loading) as
>>> __vmalloc_node_range() checks for zero-sized allocs and returns null:
>>>
>>> [  115.466896] module_64: cast_common: doesn't contain __patchable_function_entries.
>>> [  115.469189] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [  115.469496] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 274 at mm/vmalloc.c:3778 __vmalloc_node_range_noprof+0x8b4/0x8f0
>>> ...
>>> [  115.478574] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>> [  115.479545] execmem: unable to allocate memory
>>
>> Ugh, that's nasty.
>>
>>>
>>> Fix this by removing the check completely, since it is anyway not
>>> helpful to propagate this as an error upwards.
>>>
>>> Fixes: eec37961a56a ("powerpc64/ftrace: Move ftrace sequence out of line")
>>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@...e.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 4 ----
>>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for fixing this. It might also be good to add a check in 
>> setup_ftrace_ool_stubs(). Something like this:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> index 34a5aec4908f..c10a9c66cfe3 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> @@ -1125,6 +1125,10 @@ static int setup_ftrace_ool_stubs(const Elf64_Shdr *sechdrs, unsigned long addr,
>>         unsigned int i, total_stubs, num_stubs;
>>         struct ppc64_stub_entry *stub;
>>  
>> +       /* Bail out early if no traceable functions */
>> +       if (!me->arch.ool_stub_count)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>>         total_stubs = sechdrs[me->arch.stubs_section].sh_size / sizeof(*stub);
>>         num_stubs = roundup(me->arch.ool_stub_count * sizeof(struct ftrace_ool_stub),
>>                             sizeof(struct ppc64_stub_entry)) / sizeof(struct ppc64_stub_entry);
>>
>>
>> Regardless of that, for this patch:
>> Acked-by: Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@...nel.org>
>>
>>
>> - Naveen
>>
> Is there anything that can be done to get this bumped along? It
> completely breaks networking on Fedora's power9 boxes, as it affects
> the i40e module which they use.
> 

Sorry missed this, Will pull it in.

Thanks.
Maddy

> Thanks!