[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbad733f-d034-4d63-ab82-ed867f0ed5d4@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:48:50 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] spi: Add support for Double Transfer Rate (DTR) mode
On 3/26/25 2:25 PM, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> Hi Mark, thanks for your comment.
>
> On 3/26/2025 6:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 02:09:54PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>
>>> This change introduces a new field `dtr_mode` in the `spi_transfer`
>>> structure. The `dtr_mode` field allows protocol drivers to indicate if
>>> Double Transfer Rate (DTR) mode is supported for a given transfer. When
>>> `dtr_mode` is set to true, the SPI controller will use DTR mode
>>> otherwise, it will default to single transfer mode.
>>
>>> The QSPI controller driver uses this flag and configures single or
>>> double
>>> transfer rate using the controller register.
>>
>> We should have a flag in the controller indicating if it supports this,
>> and code in the core which returns an error if a driver attempts to use
>> it when the controller doesn't support it.
> Have added below in spi.h which can be set by client and controller
> driver should be using it to decide mode.
>
> + bool dtr_mode;
>
> since default it's false, should continue with SDR.
> I believe for QSPI, it supports SDR or DDR, but it's not applicable to
> standard SPI right ? So not sure in which case we should return an error ?
>
Please check how spimem is dealing with DTR, same ideas shall be applied
for spi transfers.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists