[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7aced4cd-b451-4b14-8bcc-92617a02a672@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:31:55 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
jorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/198] 6.1.132-rc1 review
On 25/03/2025 15:22, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 17:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.132 release.
>> There are 198 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:21:27 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.132-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Regressions on arm64 rk3399 dtb builds failed with gcc-13 the
> stable-rc 6.1.132-rc1
>
> First seen on the v6.1.131-199-gc8f0cb669e59
> Good: v6.1.131
> Bad: 6.1.132-rc1
>
> * arm64, build
> - gcc-13-defconfig
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? yes
> - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Build regression: arm64 dtb rockchip non-existent node or label "vcca_0v9"
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> ## Build log
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi:221.23-266.4: ERROR
> (phandle_references):
> /pcie@...00000: Reference to non-existent node or label "vcca_0v9"
>
> also defined at arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dtsi:665.8-675.3
I am also seeing this build error for linux v6.1.y, v6.6.y and v6.12.y too.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists