[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8ccc874-e153-4b78-8159-9923dfa77fc3@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:32:53 -0700
From: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, bhelgaas@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, conor+dt@...nel.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, decui@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
hpa@...or.com, joey.gouly@....com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
kys@...rosoft.com, lenb@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, robh@...nel.org,
ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com, sudeep.holla@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, wei.liu@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
yuzenghui@...wei.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
apais@...rosoft.com, benhill@...rosoft.com, bperkins@...rosoft.com,
sunilmut@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH hyperv-next v6 10/11] ACPI: irq: Introduce
acpi_get_gsi_dispatcher()
On 3/26/2025 7:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 1:19 AM Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
[...]
>
> This basically looks OK to me except for a couple of coding style
> related nits below.
>
Appreciate taking time to review this very much! Will squash the nits in
the next version.
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/irq.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 ++++-
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/irq.c b/drivers/acpi/irq.c
>> index 1687483ff319..8eb09e45e5c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/irq.c
>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>>
>> enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model;
>>
>> -static struct fwnode_handle *(*acpi_get_gsi_domain_id)(u32 gsi);
>> +static acpi_gsi_domain_disp_fn acpi_get_gsi_domain_id;
>> static u32 (*acpi_gsi_to_irq_fallback)(u32 gsi);
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -307,12 +307,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_irq_get);
>> * for a given GSI
>> */
>> void __init acpi_set_irq_model(enum acpi_irq_model_id model,
>> - struct fwnode_handle *(*fn)(u32))
>
> Please retain the indentation here and analogously below.
>
>> + acpi_gsi_domain_disp_fn fn)
>> {
>> acpi_irq_model = model;
>> acpi_get_gsi_domain_id = fn;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * acpi_get_gsi_dispatcher - Returns dispatcher function that
>> + * computes the domain fwnode for a
>> + * given GSI.
>> + */
>
> I would format this kerneldoc comment a bit differently:
>
> /*
> * acpi_get_gsi_dispatcher() - Get the GSI dispatcher function
> *
> * Return the dispatcher function that computes the domain fwnode for
> a given GSI.
> */
>
>> +acpi_gsi_domain_disp_fn acpi_get_gsi_dispatcher(void)
>> +{
>> + return acpi_get_gsi_domain_id;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_gsi_dispatcher);
>> +
>> /**
>> * acpi_set_gsi_to_irq_fallback - Register a GSI transfer
>> * callback to fallback to arch specified implementation.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> index 4e495b29c640..abc51288e867 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> @@ -336,8 +336,11 @@ int acpi_register_gsi (struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int triggering, int polarity
>> int acpi_gsi_to_irq (u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq);
>> int acpi_isa_irq_to_gsi (unsigned isa_irq, u32 *gsi);
>>
>> +typedef struct fwnode_handle *(*acpi_gsi_domain_disp_fn)(u32);
>> +
>> void acpi_set_irq_model(enum acpi_irq_model_id model,
>> - struct fwnode_handle *(*)(u32));
>> + acpi_gsi_domain_disp_fn fn);
>> +acpi_gsi_domain_disp_fn acpi_get_gsi_dispatcher(void);
>> void acpi_set_gsi_to_irq_fallback(u32 (*)(u32));
>>
>> struct irq_domain *acpi_irq_create_hierarchy(unsigned int flags,
>> --
>
> With the above addressed, please feel free to add
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> to the patch and route it along with the rest of the series.
>
Will do, thanks!
> Thanks!
--
Thank you,
Roman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists