[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdb8ef9b-3053-4dbd-b3f0-e2fd512de770@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:57:21 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/34] defconfigs: rename CONFIG_MFD_SEC_CORE to
CONFIG_MFD_SEC_I2C
On 27/03/2025 09:56, André Draszik wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 08:16 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/03/2025 23:39, André Draszik wrote:
>>> We are adding support for Samsung PMICs that aren't using I2C and
>>> therefore had to rename the Kconfig symbol.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/configs/pxa_defconfig | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> defconfigs go separate tree, so this must not be in the middle of the
>> patchset. Bisectability, as for defconfig, is anyway broken in previous
>> change, so no benefit of putting this in the middle anyway.
>
> OK. Should it still be part of this series, e.g. at the start, after
> the binding changes, or a completely separate stand-alone patch with
> a reference to this series?
Hm, now as I am thinking, maybe we should just squash it with previous
patch and take everything via MFD? defconfig could be mixed with the
drivers, it's a kernel thing, not like DTS.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists