[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <slyrgedp776oi4zhzqf4i4re5dwu2v4ubclh7rlopq6mfffve4@lpkqxjz36jcj>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:36:57 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com,
rafael@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, pavel@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] vfs: make sb_start_write freezable
On Thu 27-03-25 10:06:11, James Bottomley wrote:
> If a write happens on a frozen filesystem, the s_writers.rw_sem gets
> stuck in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and inhibits suspending or hibernating
> the system. Since we want to freeze filesystems first then tasks, we
> need this condition not to inhibit suspend/hibernate, which means the
> wait has to have the TASK_FREEZABLE flag as well. Use the freezable
> version of percpu-rwsem to ensure this.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index dd84d1c3b8af..cbbb704eff74 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1782,7 +1782,8 @@ static inline void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
>
> static inline void __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
> {
> - percpu_down_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level - 1);
> + percpu_down_read_freezable(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level - 1,
> + level == SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
> }
>
> static inline bool __sb_start_write_trylock(struct super_block *sb, int level)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists