[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2kwzi2qxqualhskbgckk6m7oc6vsgupquceqgfx2gnz5xbkier@rwdrhym7yxhr>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 19:39:21 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, "Aithal, Srikanth" <sraithal@....com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Roth, Michael" <Michael.Roth@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next regression: SNP Guest boot hangs with certain cpu/mem
config combination
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:43:43 +0200
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > > > The only option I see so far is to drop static branch from this path.
> > > >
> > > > But I am not sure if it the only case were we use static branch from CPU
> > > > hotplug callbacks.
> > > >
> > > > Any other ideas?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmmm, didn't take too close a look here, but there is the
> > > static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked() variant, would that work here? Is the issue
> > > the caller may or may not have the cpu_hotplug lock?
> >
> > Yes. This is generic page alloc path and it can be called with and without
> > the lock.
>
> Note, it's not the static_branch that is an issue, it's enabling/disabling
> the static branch that is. Changing a static branch takes a bit of work as
> it does modify the kernel text.
>
> Is it possible to delay the update via a workqueue?
Ah. Good point. Should work. I'll give it try.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists