linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 09/28] landlock: Add AUDIT_LANDLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250327213807.12964-1-m@maowtm.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 21:38:05 +0000
From: Tingmao Wang <m@...wtm.org>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: audit@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/28] landlock: Add AUDIT_LANDLOCK_ACCESS and log ptrace denials

Hi Mickaël,

On 3/20/25 19:06, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
[...]
> +static struct landlock_hierarchy *
> +get_hierarchy(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain, const size_t layer)
> +{
> +	struct landlock_hierarchy *hierarchy = domain->hierarchy;
> +	ssize_t i;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(layer >= domain->num_layers))
> +		return hierarchy;
> +
> +	for (i = domain->num_layers - 1; i > layer; i--) {
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!hierarchy->parent))
> +			break;
> +
> +		hierarchy = hierarchy->parent;
> +	}
> +
> +	return hierarchy;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_KUNIT_TEST
> +
> +static void test_get_hierarchy(struct kunit *const test)
> +{
> +	struct landlock_hierarchy dom0_hierarchy = {
> +		.id = 10,
> +	};
> +	struct landlock_hierarchy dom1_hierarchy = {
> +		.parent = &dom0_hierarchy,
> +		.id = 20,
> +	};
> +	struct landlock_hierarchy dom2_hierarchy = {
> +		.parent = &dom1_hierarchy,
> +		.id = 30,
> +	};
> +	struct landlock_ruleset dom2 = {
> +		.hierarchy = &dom2_hierarchy,
> +		.num_layers = 3,
> +	};
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 10, get_hierarchy(&dom2, 0)->id);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 20, get_hierarchy(&dom2, 1)->id);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 30, get_hierarchy(&dom2, 2)->id);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 30, get_hierarhy(&dom2, -1)->id);

This causes a warning from WARN_ON_ONCE(layer >= domain->num_layers)
when running this test, I guess because layer is unsigned.  Should it
be ssize_t, if this is an expected usage?

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 145 at security/landlock/audit.c:142 get_hierarchy (security/landlock/audit.c:142)
Modules linked in:
CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 145 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G                 N  6.14.0-next-20250326-dev-00004-g4e57edc3e062-dirty #5 PREEMPT(undef)
Tainted: [N]=TEST
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:get_hierarchy (security/landlock/audit.c:142)
Code: 83 e8 02 e8 18 00 84 c0 75 02 0f 0b 48 83 c4 08 48 89 d8 5b 41 5c 41 5e 5d c3 48 c7 c7 00 f3 21 83 e8 e2 e7 18 00 84 c0 75 e2 <0f> 0b eb de 48 89 75 e0 e8 a1 a9 a7 ff 48 8b 75 e0 e9 76 ff ff ff
// snip //
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
test_get_hierarchy (security/landlock/audit.c:178 (discriminator 5))
? test_get_denied_layer (security/landlock/audit.c:158)
? lock_repin_lock (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5649 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5978)
? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4675 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5189)
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (./include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:151 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194)
? find_held_lock (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5348)
? trace_irq_enable (./include/trace/events/preemptirq.h:40 (discriminator 17))
? trace_hardirqs_on (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:80)
? kvm_clock_get_cycles (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:95 arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c:80 arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c:86)
? ktime_get_ts64 (kernel/time/timekeeping.c:318 (discriminator 4) kernel/time/timekeeping.c:335 (discriminator 4) kernel/time/timekeeping.c:907 (discriminator 4))
kunit_try_run_case (lib/kunit/test.c:400 lib/kunit/test.c:443)
? kunit_try_run_case_cleanup (lib/kunit/test.c:430)