[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0wqw0gg.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 23:52:31 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dwmw@...zon.co.uk, mhkelley@...look.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/i8253: fix possible deadlock when turning off
the PIT
On Thu, Mar 27 2025 at 22:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Though I really want people to sit down and think about the factual
> impact of a tool based problem observation. Tools are good in detecting
> problems, but they are patently bad in properly analysing them. And no,
> AI is not going to fix that anytime soon, quite the contrary.
May I recommend you to ask your favorite AI model of the moment the
following question:
"Explain the discussion in the email thread starting at:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250327152258.3097-1-ffmancera@riseup.net"
I'm sure that I'm patently bad at AI prompt engineering, but that does
not justify the utter insanities which these models threw back at me.
ChapGPT:
"....
This patch adds a selftest (automated test) for the nftables
flowtable feature using a netdevice. It targets the netfilter
subsystem, which is responsible for packet filtering, NAT, and other
packet mangling in the Linux kernel."
Grok:
See
https://tglx.de/~tglx/grok.html
for the full glory of AI hallucinations.
At least those two were halfways reasonable:
Gemini:
"API REQUEST ERROR Reason: Unknown."
Claude:
"I don't have access to the specific URL you've provided ...
my knowledge cutoff was in October 2024 ..."
Seriously?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists