linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v5 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add Everest ES8389 audio CODEC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1023814e-1cc5-4f0d-9d60-cbe848d69a9b@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:06:44 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Zhang Yi <zhangyi@...rest-semi.com>, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
 tiwai@...e.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz, krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc: amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND v5 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add Everest ES8389 audio CODEC

On 27/03/2025 07:35, Zhang Yi wrote:
> Add device tree binding documentation for Everest ES8389 which
> is different from ES8388
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <zhangyi@...rest-semi.com>

So you not only ignored review but I gave you long instruction what to
do, so that will not happen. And what happened? You wrote:

"Thank you for the explanation.I will do it in a following patch"

and then ignored it entirely!

That entire instruction was on purpose - to prevent possible mistake, to
explain how the process works, because I assume you will not read our
documents like submitting-patches. Well, you should read them prior to
sending, but it happens, so thus my instruction.

And yet we are in the same spot.

I am not doing the same work twice.

Best regards,
Krzysztof