[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250327-pragmatic-lemon-flounder-e2936a@krzk-bin>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:55:53 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Matt Coster <matt.coster@...tec.com>
Cc: Frank Binns <frank.binns@...tec.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>, Darren Etheridge <detheridge@...com>,
Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>, Alessio Belle <alessio.belle@...tec.com>,
Alexandru Dadu <alexandru.dadu@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] dt-bindings: gpu: img: Future-proofing
enhancements
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 04:48:21PM +0000, Matt Coster wrote:
> The first compatible strings added for the AXE-1-16M are not sufficient to
> accurately describe all the IMG Rogue GPUs. The current "img,img-axe"
> string refers to the entire family of Series AXE GPUs, but this is
> primarily a marketing term and does not denote a level of hardware
> similarity any greater than just "Rogue".
>
> The more specific "img,img-axe-1-16m" string refers to individual AXE-1-16M
> GPU. For example, unlike the rest of the Series AXE GPUs, the AXE-1-16M
> only uses a single power domain.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists