[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z+UGqItLubQ9kwF+@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:04:56 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Christopher Obbard <christopher.obbard@...aro.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/dp: fallback to maximum when PWM bit count is
zero
On 25-03-25 19:21:29, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> Some eDP devices report DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT as 0, but still provide
> valid non-zero MIN and MAX values. This patch reworks the logic to
> fallback to the max value in such cases, ensuring correct backlight PWM
> configuration even when the bit count value is not explicitly set.
>
> This improves compatibility with eDP panels (e.g. Samsung ATNA40YK20
> used on the Lenovo T14s Gen6 Snapdragon with OLED panel) which reports
> DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT as 0 but still provides valid non-zero MIN/MAX
> values.
>
Nit-pick: AFAICT, there is no relationship between this patch and the
rest. So it should've probably not be part of this patchset.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists