[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250327-noisy-dogfish-of-advertising-69bb05@krzk-bin>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:18:23 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@...ebox.fr>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Arnaud Vrac <avrac@...ebox.fr>,
Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@...cinc.com>, Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] dt-bindings: soc: qcom,rpmh-rsc: Limit
power-domains requirement
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 02:47:03AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Certain platforms (such as Chrome SDM845 and SC7180 with a TF-A running
> as secure firmware) do not have a OSI-mode capable PSCI implementation.
>
> That in turn means the PSCI-associated power domain which represents the
> system's power state can't provide enough feedback to the RSC device.
>
> Don't require power-domains on platforms where this may be the case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists