[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z+Ubvvrj9DovVs71@phytium.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:34:54 +0800
From: Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@...tium.com.cn>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>, lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM] CXL Boot to Bash - Section 0: ACPI and Linux Resources
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:55:39PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > Basically, the heuristic is as follows:
> > 1) Add one NUMA node per Proximity Domain described in SRAT
>
> if it contains, memory, CPU or generic initiator.
In the future, srat.c would add one seperate NUMA node for each
Generic Port in SRAT.
System firmware should know the performance characteristics between
CPU/GI to the GP, and the static HMAT should include this coordinate.
Is my understanding right?
Yuquan
>
> > 2) If the SRAT describes all memory described by all CFMWS
> > - do not create nodes for CFMWS
> > 3) If SRAT does not describe all memory described by CFMWS
> > - create a node for that CFMWS
> >
> > Generally speaking, you will see one NUMA node per Host bridge, unless
> > inter-host-bridge interleave is in use (see Section 4 - Interleave).
>
> I just love corners: QoS concerns might mean multiple CFMWS and hence
> multiple nodes per host bridge (feel free to ignore this one - has
> anyone seen this in the wild yet?) Similar mess for properties such
> as persistence, sharing etc.
>
> J
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists