[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PN3P287MB1829B0776EF3D34D0CA78CB18BA12@PN3P287MB1829.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:02:33 +0000
From: Tarang Raval <tarang.raval@...iconsignals.io>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com" <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
"Shravan.Chippa@...rochip.com" <Shravan.Chippa@...rochip.com>, Mauro Carvalho
Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Laurent
Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Julien Massot
<julien.massot@...labora.com>, Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@...iatek.com>, Mikhail
Rudenko <mike.rudenko@...il.com>, Benjamin Mugnier
<benjamin.mugnier@...s.st.com>, Luis Garcia <git@...gi311.com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] media: i2c: imx334: Enable runtime PM before
sub-device registration
Hi Sakari,
Thanks for the review.
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:47:48PM +0530, Tarang Raval wrote:
> > Runtime PM is fully initialized before calling
> > v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor(). Moving the runtime PM initialization
> > earlier prevents potential access to an uninitialized or powered-down device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tarang Raval <tarang.raval@...iconsignals.io>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > index ffa39bb317f7..8964d60324e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx334.c
> > @@ -1295,6 +1295,9 @@ static int imx334_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > goto error_handler_free;
> > }
> >
> > + pm_runtime_set_active(imx334->dev);
> > + pm_runtime_enable(imx334->dev);
> > +
> > ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor(&imx334->sd);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > dev_err(imx334->dev,
> > @@ -1302,8 +1305,6 @@ static int imx334_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > goto error_media_entity;
> > }
> >
> > - pm_runtime_set_active(imx334->dev);
> > - pm_runtime_enable(imx334->dev);
>
> Please also change error handling accordingly.
Oh, I missed that.
> Btw. the remove function calls pm_runtime_suspended() that does nothing
> (use pm_runtime_set_suspended() instead). Could you add a patch to fix it?
Should I include these changes in this patch, or should I create a separate
patch for them.
Best Regards,
Tarang
> > pm_runtime_idle(imx334->dev);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists