[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D9ADCA08-C3B3-4964-BDB9-E62A2C7DE85F@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:46:29 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
lgirdwood@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] rust: regulator: add a bare minimum regulator
abstraction
Hi Mark,
> On 27 Mar 2025, at 08:32, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 04:49:26PM -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
>>> On 26 Mar 2025, at 15:56, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>>> + /// Disables the regulator.
>>>> + pub fn disable(self) -> Result<Regulator> {
>>>> + // Keep the count on `regulator_get()`.
>>>> + let regulator = ManuallyDrop::new(self);
>
>>> This looks like user code could manually call it which feels like asking
>>> for trouble?
>
>> Yes, user code can call this. My understanding is that drivers may want to
>> disable the regulator at runtime, possibly to save power when the device is
>> idle?
>
>> What trouble are you referring to?
>
> My understanding was that the enable was done by transforming a
> Regulator into an EnabledRegulator but if you can explicitly call
> disable() on an EnabledRegulator without destroying it then you've got
> an EnabledRegulator which isn't actually enabled. Perhaps it's not
> clear to me how the API should work?
No, you misunderstood a bit, but that’s on me, I should have included examples.
> +impl EnabledRegulator {
> + /// Disables the regulator.
> + pub fn disable(self) -> Result<Regulator>
disable() consumes EnabledRegulator to return Regulator.
Any function that takes 'self' by value (i.e.: “self" instead of “&self” )
effectively kills it. So, in that sense, disable() performs a conversion
between the two types after calling regulator_disable().
— Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists