linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Clean up the PSCI PDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f2e1090e-d4b7-4984-b852-5d7cb54bae6f@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 15:06:03 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
        Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@...ebox.fr>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Arnaud Vrac <avrac@...ebox.fr>,
        Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@...cinc.com>,
        Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@...cinc.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Clean up the PSCI PDs

On 3/27/25 3:00 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 02:47:13AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Because SA8775P comes with two disjoint CPU clusters, we have to follow
>> a similar topology description like the one in sm8750.dtsi, so:
>>
>> system_pd
>> 	cluster0_pd
>> 		cpu_pd0
>> 		...
>> 	cluster1_pd
>> 		cpu_pd4
>> 		...
>>
>> Do that & wire it up to APPS RSC to make the bindings checker happy.
> 
> Should these two be separate commits? One being pure cosmetics and
> another one being a fix (probably with a Fixes tag).

potayto-potahto, both are needed to achieve a non-cosmetic bugfix

Konrad