[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c58b129c-1c83-44f3-bd52-13cc24e50cbb@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 15:28:33 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/18] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8450-camcc: Allow to
specify two power domains
On 27/03/2025 09:52, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
> - A phandle to an OPP node describing required MMCX performance point.
> + Phandles to OPP nodes that describe required performance point on power domains
I believe we are dropping "Phandle to" generally as this is a redundant
statement.
You should also pluralise performance-points.
.. required performance-points on power-domains
Other than that
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists