linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] dt-bindings: net: Add network-class.yaml schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42F3BE66-15C3-4C95-8133-2EA19E54B32F@ixit.cz>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 19:52:18 +0000
From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Mailing List <devicetree-spec-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@...lic.gmane.org>,
 Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
 Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
 Mailing List <devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] dt-bindings: net: Add network-class.yaml schema

Hi Johannes,

from the functionality standpoint this bindings do not change anything.

From validation point, if the `make dtbs_check` will pass as expected, it should yield only better results for integrators and developers. 

Thou if you want to postpone it for 6.16, I'll understand.

Thank you
David

On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 23:08 +0000, David Heidelberg wrote:
> > I can do that, but I suppose it's 6.16 material at this point.
> 
> Hi Johannes. 
> 
> I assume you meant 6.15? 

No. 6.15 merge window just opened.

> This patchset should mainly clarify where these properties can be used and address incorrect warnings regarding device-tree verification. 

I'm not really convinced that makes it a bugfix for the rc series
though?

johannes