[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b26a2a43-3c55-4086-88e2-64e65dcfbeb2@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:06:28 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tools: Drop unlikely definition from
insn_decoder_test
On 3/19/25 14:31, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> After commit c104c16073b7 ("Kunit to check the longest symbol length"),
>> there is a warning when building with clang because there is now a
>> definition of unlikely from compiler.h in tools/include/linux, which
>> conflicts with the one in the instruction decoder selftest.
>>
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c:15:9: warning: 'unlikely' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
>> 15 | #define unlikely(cond) (cond)
>> | ^
>> tools/include/linux/compiler.h:128:10: note: previous definition is here
>> 128 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>> | ^
>> 1 warning generated.
>>
>> Remove the second unlikely definition, as it is no longer necessary,
>> clearing up the warning.
>>
>> Fixes: c104c16073b7 ("Kunit to check the longest symbol length")
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> I suppose this should be merged into the Kunit tree? The c104c16073b7
> commit is in -next currently.
>
> Anyway:
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>
Thanks Ingo.
David/Brendan, Okay to apply this for the next rc?
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists