[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:39:08 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
<marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>
Subject:
[PATCH v1 01/10] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq
driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all,
cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present
and prevent it from being unregistered.
For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq
policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding
policy object, if present.
Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl
Reporetd-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2781,6 +2781,12 @@
*/
void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
+
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ if (!policy)
+ return;
+
if (cpufreq_driver->update_limits)
cpufreq_driver->update_limits(cpu);
else
Powered by blists - more mailing lists