[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-Zn1KkNTNCGvEcj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:11:48 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Scarlata, Vincent R" <vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com>,
"Cai, Chong" <chongc@...gle.com>,
"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
"Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
"dionnaglaze@...gle.com" <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
"bondarn@...gle.com" <bondarn@...gle.com>,
"Raynor, Scott" <scott.raynor@...el.com>,
"Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/sgx: Add total number of EPC pages
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 10:42:18AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> In your code example you had a loop inside spinlock, which was based on
> a return code of an opcode, i.e. potentially infinite loop.
>
> I'd like to remind you that the hardware I have is NUC7 from 2018 so
> you really have to nail how things will work semantically as I can
> only think these things only in theoretical level ;-) [1]
That said, I do execute these in NUC7 but is getting a bit old..
Cheapest hardware I've heard is Xeon E-2334 but even that with
case etc. is like nearing 2k in price.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists