linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/18] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8450-camcc: Allow to specify two power domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <98bf09d2-0ad4-4499-b020-88107c115c01@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:09:27 +0530
From: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "Stephen
 Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
CC: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
        Imran Shaik
	<quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        "Satya Priya
 Kakitapalli" <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/18] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8450-camcc: Allow to
 specify two power domains



On 3/27/2025 8:58 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 27/03/2025 09:52, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>> -      A phandle to an OPP node describing required MMCX performance point.
>> +      Phandles to OPP nodes that describe required performance point on power domains
> 
> I believe we are dropping "Phandle to" generally as this is a redundant statement.
> 
> You should also pluralise performance-points.
> 
> .. required performance-points on power-domains
> 
> Other than that
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> 

Yes, I will fix above in the next series.

Thanks,
Jagadeesh

> ---
> bod