linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs for 6.15, v2...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ighuwxny4a3obxwbmfsblz4lzpc2qubqqu4nqf6yvqsttuqffc@hs2tbqrwjo4v>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:48:10 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs for 6.15, v2...

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 04:46:21PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 14:56 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > The following changes since commit
> > 1a2b74d0a2a46c219b25fdb0efcf9cd7f55cfe5e:
> > 
> >   bcachefs: fix build on 32 bit in get_random_u64_below() (2025-03-14
> > 19:45:54 -0400)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://evilpiepirate.org/bcachefs.git tags/bcachefs-2025-03-24
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to
> > d8bdc8daac1d1b0a4efb1ecc69bef4eb4fc5e050:
> > 
> >   bcachefs: Kill unnecessary bch2_dev_usage_read() (2025-03-24
> > 09:50:37 -0400)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > bcachefs updates for 6.15
> 
> I note that the controversial block changes that got NAK'd but which
> you tried to put into your first pull request are now removed from this
> v2 pull request, thanks.
> 
> I also thought it was time to state more formally what's been
> circulating around a few maintainers as shared knowledge: any tree you
> send a pull request for that includes changes outside of bcachefs won't
> be accepted by Linus.

We had a situation where the process clearly broke down in -block, and I
opted to let Linus make the call (knowing he'd already been CC'd on the
previous thread).