[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd4b1013-1985-4745-89ff-ce9a83104e2c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 18:08:31 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: shao.mingyin@....com.cn, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: kishon@...nel.org, wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
samuel@...lland.org, zhang.enpei@....com.cn, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yang.yang29@....com.cn, xu.xin16@....com.cn,
ye.xingchen@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy/allwinner: phy-sun50i-usb3: Use dev_err_probe()
On 28/03/2025 10:02, shao.mingyin@....com.cn wrote:
> From: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with dev_err_probe() to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Shao Mingyin <shao.mingyin@....com.cn>
Why are you sending patch-by-patch? Organize your work for the same
subsystem into one patchset so we see entire picture at once, not spread
onto 10 separate threads.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists