[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a96511dc-5ba1-4302-acb0-f3b49bf8990c@quicinc.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:38:14 +0530
From: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula
<jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 2/3] i3c: master: Add Qualcomm I3C controller driver
Hi Markus,
On 3/29/2025 12:34 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Under which circumstances would you become interested to apply a statement
>>> like “guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&gi3c->irq_lock);”?
>> Didn't get, hence a question. Do you suggest to use DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1 instead of existing method ?
> I propose to pick further opportunities up for benefits from scope-based resource management.
>
Sorry, still not clear to me what should i add/change ? please share me
some example.
> Regards,
> Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists