[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df4f0ce855b7acd6fc9777457b89359e075a5cbb.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:33:44 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski
<luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/tlb: Fix wrong judgement in
allocate_global_asid()
On Sat, 2025-03-29 at 21:05 +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> In allocate_global_asid(), 'global_asid_available' cannot be zero, as
> it
> has already been checked in use_global_asid(). Therefore, the warning
> in
> allocate_global_asid() cannot be triggered; fix the wrong judgment in
> allocate_global_asid().
>
> Fixes: d504d1247e36 ("x86/mm: Add global ASID allocation helper
> functions")
> Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>
Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Looking at allocate_global_asid() again, I wonder if
that needs to be turned back into a loop.
What if we have no global asids available, and then
an asid gets freed that is smaller than the value
of last_global_asid?
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists