[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467838dc-a549-4c15-84ea-1322043542d1@collabora.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:04:50 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Honglei Huang <honglei1.huang@....com>, David Airlie
<airlied@...hat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>, Chia-I Wu
<olvaffe@...il.com>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/virtio: implement userptr: add interval tree
On 3/30/25 14:57, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> + userptr = virtio_gpu_userptr_from_addr_range(
>> + vfpriv, params->userptr, params->userptr + params->size - 1UL);
> Is it possible that userptr address will be same for two different
> processes?
See now the vfpriv->userptrs_tree, i.e. it's not a global tree.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists