linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] BPF resilient spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg+nyd6Cqnw-vVxvVTTW31zOyBOHO0ak1xPFX5C0qut=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 13:08:40 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, 
	martin.lau@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] BPF resilient spin_lock for 6.15

On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 07:48, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This patch set introduces Resilient Queued Spin Lock (or rqspinlock with
> res_spin_lock() and res_spin_unlock() APIs).

I would have loved to have seen explicit acks from the locking people,
but the code looks fine to me.

And I saw the discussions and I didn't get the feeling that anybody
hated it. Merged.

             Linus