[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z+nKOYxiTWGNI9FQ@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 06:48:25 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/gup: fix wrongly calculated returned value in
fault_in_safe_writeable()
On 03/30/25 at 09:43pm, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> 在 2025/3/30 14:17, Baoquan He 写道:
> > Not like fault_in_writeable() or fault_in_writeable(), in
> fault_in_readable()?
>
> In the above, one of the 2 fault_in_writeable should be fault_in_readable()
> ?
You are right, I will fix it in v2. Thanks.
> > fault_in_safe_writeable() local variable 'start' is increased page
> > by page to loop till the whole address range is handled. However,
> > it mistakenly calcalates the size of handled range with 'uaddr - start'.
> >
> > Fix it here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/gup.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> > index 855ab860f88b..73777b1de679 100644
> > --- a/mm/gup.c
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -2207,8 +2207,8 @@ size_t fault_in_safe_writeable(const char __user *uaddr, size_t size)
> > } while (start != end);
> > mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > - if (size > (unsigned long)uaddr - start)
> > - return size - ((unsigned long)uaddr - start);
> > + if (size > start - (unsigned long)uaddr)
> > + return size - (start - (unsigned long)uaddr);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(fault_in_safe_writeable);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists