[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-sDc-0qyfPZz9lv@mini-arch>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:04:51 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Joerg Reuter <jreuter@...na.de>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>,
Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>,
Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Remi Denis-Courmont <courmisch@...il.com>,
Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net/io_uring: pass a kernel pointer via optlen_t
to proto[_ops].getsockopt()
On 03/31, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> The motivation for this is to remove the SOL_SOCKET limitation
> from io_uring_cmd_getsockopt().
>
> The reason for this limitation is that io_uring_cmd_getsockopt()
> passes a kernel pointer as optlen to do_sock_getsockopt()
> and can't reach the ops->getsockopt() path.
>
> The first idea would be to change the optval and optlen arguments
> to the protocol specific hooks also to sockptr_t, as that
> is already used for setsockopt() and also by do_sock_getsockopt()
> sk_getsockopt() and BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT().
>
> But as Linus don't like 'sockptr_t' I used a different approach.
>
> @Linus, would that optlen_t approach fit better for you?
[..]
> Instead of passing the optlen as user or kernel pointer,
> we only ever pass a kernel pointer and do the
> translation from/to userspace in do_sock_getsockopt().
At this point why not just fully embrace iov_iter? You have the size
now + the user (or kernel) pointer. Might as well do
s/sockptr_t/iov_iter/ conversion?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists